魔鬼藏在細節裡？探究理論沒有說的課堂實踐困境與挑戰：以高中公民與社會科為例

• Published in: Journal of Education Research (Print) pp. 083 - 098
• Main Authors: 林浩民(Hao-Min Lin), 洪承宇(Cheng-Yu Hung)
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Chinese
• Published: 台灣 高等教育文化事業有限公司 01.10.2023
• Subjects: civics and society curriculum; inquiry-based teaching; research ethics; risk assessment; 公民與社會課綱; 學術倫理; 探究式教學; 風險評估; risk assessment; 探究式教學; 風險評估; civics and society curriculum; 學術倫理; inquiry-based teaching; research ethics; 公民與社會課綱
• ISSN: 1680-6360

探究式教學理論在發展過程中，逐漸歸納出一系列的探究流程。我國108課綱中公民與社會科下的「公共議題與社會探究」加深加廣課程，提供學生體驗探究學習的機會。在課綱設計的形成過程中，提出了「發現與界定問題、觀察與蒐集資料、分析與詮釋資料、總結與反思」等四要項，指引著教師的課程安排。然而，探究理論的操作流程背後藏著理論所未觸及的實務困境與挑戰。本文訪談10位教授此門課程的高中公民教師，受訪者提出「強鷹架」與「弱鷹架」策略、文化不利者的資料蒐集困境、消息來源可信度、探究風險與學術倫理等問題，值得未來課綱調整與教授此門課的新手教師參考
In the evolution of inquiry-based learning theories in Taiwan, a standard implementation procedure has gradually formed. An enrichment program, named ‘Public Issues and Social Inquiry’ incorporates this procedure and aims to provide students the experiences of inquiry-based investigation. This program introduces four steps guiding the program design— discover and define questions, observe and gather information, analyze and interpret data, and conclude and reflect perspectives. However, behind these procedures, there are untold but pivotal details in the classroom practice worth being given additional emphasis. This article interviews ten citizenship teachers, who have taught this program and reveals their views on and “ruses” for their teaching, inc