Why Do Surgeons Miss Malignancies in Patients with Acute Abdominal Pain?
Background: The aim of this study was to characterize patients seeking medical advice for acute abdominal pain who were later diagnosed with an intra-abdominal malignancy. Patients and Methods: Patients with acute abdominal pain were registered between 1997 and 2000, employing a detailed schedule co...
Saved in:
Published in | Anticancer research Vol. 26; no. 5B; pp. 3675 - 3678 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Attiki
International Institute of Anticancer Research
01.09.2006
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background: The aim of this study was to characterize patients seeking medical advice for acute abdominal pain who were later
diagnosed with an intra-abdominal malignancy. Patients and Methods: Patients with acute abdominal pain were registered between
1997 and 2000, employing a detailed schedule comprising 111 parameters. The diagnoses (n=2395 patients) were re-evaluated
one year later. Results: A total of 66 patients (2.8%) were found to have an intra-abdominal malignancy at follow-up, of whom
37 cases had been undetected at discharge. Malignancy of the liver, biliary tract and pancreas constituted 30% and colorectal
cancer 32% of the tumours undetected at discharge. Constipation, intestinal obstruction and non-specific abdominal pain (NSAP)
were the most common preliminary diagnoses in patients among whom abdominal malignancy was later detected. Conclusion: Except
for age and pain duration, the history and clinical investigation provide few clues to suggest an abdominal malignancy in
patients with acute abdominal pain. NSAP, of unknown or known etiology, including constipation, should be suspected as a possible
sign of abdominal malignancy in all patients over 50 years of age. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0250-7005 1791-7530 1791-7530 |