European survey on preanalytical sample handling - Part 2: Practices of European laboratories on monitoring and processing haemolytic, icteric and lipemic samples. On behalf of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for the Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE)

• Published in: Biochemia Medica Vol. 29; no. 2; p. 020705
• Main Authors: Cadamuro, Janne, Lippi, Giuseppe, von Meyer, Alexander, Ibarz, Mercedes, van Dongen, Edmee, Cornes, Michael, Nybo, Mads, Vermeersch, Pieter, Grankvist, Kjell, Guimaraes, Joao Tiago, Kristensen, Gunn B B, de la Salle, Barbara, Simundic, Ana-Maria
• Format: Journal Article Paper
• Language: English
• Published: Croatia Medicinska naklada 15.06.2019; Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine
• Subjects: Chemistry, Clinical; Clinical Laboratory Techniques; Clinical Medicine; Europe; Hemolysis; Humans; Hyperlipidemias - blood; Jaundice - blood; Original; Pre-Analytical Phase; preanalytics; standardization; survey; Surveys and Questionnaires; Europe; standardization; survey; preanalytics
• ISSN: 1330-0962; 1846-7482; 1846-7482
• DOI: 10.11613/BM.2019.020705

No guideline currently exists on how to detect or document haemolysis, icterus or lipemia (HIL) in blood samples, nor on subsequent use of this information. The EFLM WG-PRE has performed a survey for assessing current practices of European laboratories in HIL monitoring. This second part of two coherent articles is focused on HIL. An online survey, containing 39 questions on preanalytical issues, was disseminated among EFLM member countries. Seventeen questions exclusively focused on assessment, management and follow-up actions of HIL in routine blood samples. Overall, 1405 valid responses from 37 countries were received. A total of 1160 (86%) of all responders stating to analyse blood samples - monitored HIL. HIL was mostly checked in clinical chemistry samples and less frequently in those received for coagulation, therapeutic drug monitoring and serology/infectious disease testing. HIL detection by automatic HIL indices or visual inspection, along with haemolysis cut-offs definition, varied widely among responders. A quarter of responders performing automated HIL checks used internal quality controls. In haemolytic/icteric/lipemic samples, most responders (70%) only rejected HIL-sensitive parameters, whilst about 20% released all test results with general comments. Other responders did not analysed but rejected the entire sample, while some released all tests, without comments. Overall, 26% responders who monitored HIL were using this information for monitoring phlebotomy or sample transport quality. Strategies for monitoring and treating haemolytic, icteric or lipemic samples are quite heterogeneous in Europe. The WG-PRE will use these insights for developing and providing recommendations aimed at harmonizing strategies across Europe.