Better Assessment of Nodal Metastases by PET/CT Fusion Compared to Side-by-Side PET/CT in Oesophageal Cancer

Background: Recently, positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has been introduced in the staging of oesophageal cancer. The impact of PET/CT fusion in comparison with side-by-side PET/CT in these tumours, was analyzed. Patients and Methods: In 61 patients, 18-F-fluorodeoxyglucose (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnticancer research Vol. 28; no. 3B; pp. 1867 - 1873
Main Authors SCHREURS, Liesbeth M, PULTRUM, Bareld B, KOOPMANS, Klaas P, VERHOEF, Christian C, JAGER, Pieter L, VAN DAM, Gooitzen M, GROEN, Henk, VAN DER JAGT, Erik J, PLUKKER, John Th. M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Attiki International Institute of Anticancer Research 01.05.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Recently, positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has been introduced in the staging of oesophageal cancer. The impact of PET/CT fusion in comparison with side-by-side PET/CT in these tumours, was analyzed. Patients and Methods: In 61 patients, 18-F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET and multidetector (md)-CT were performed within a two week interval. Software-fusion of md-CT and FDG-PET was correlated with side-by-side FDG-PET/CT reading by two independent investigators. The gold standard was the pathological outcome or clinical evidence of progression during the first year of follow-up. Results: In 18 patients (18/61; 30%), nodal staging improved with software-fusion. The number of nodal metastases increased in five patients and decreased in four patients, leading to up-staging in one patient (2%) and down-staging in three patients (5%). In nine cases (15%), certainty and localization of metastases improved. However, the number of distant metastases did not change and software-fusion did not have an influence on resectability. Conclusion: PET/CT fusion substantially improves detection and localization of nodal metastases and may have an impact on locoregional treatment options.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0250-7005
1791-7530