Family physicians’ perspectives on personal health records Qualitative study

• Published in: Canadian family physician Vol. 57; no. 5; pp. e178 - e184
• Main Authors: Yau, Gary L, Williams, Andrew S, Brown, Judith Belle
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Canada The College of Family Physicians of Canada 01.05.2011; College of Family Physicians of Canada
• Subjects: Adult; Attitude of Health Personnel; Electronic Health Records; Female; Health Records, Personal; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ontario; Physician-Patient Relations; Physicians, Family; Practice Management, Medical; Qualitative Research; Ontario
• ISSN: 0008-350X; 1715-5258

To explore FPs' perspectives on the value of personal health records (PHRs) in primary care and the implementation and adoption of PHRs in Canada. A qualitative design using semistructured interviews. Southwestern Ontario. Ten FPs. The 10 FPs participated in semistructured interviews, which were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. An iterative approach using immersion and crystallization was employed for analysis. Participants were generally positive about PHRs, and were attracted to their portability and potential to engage patients in health care. Their concerns focused on 3 main themes: data management, practice management, and the patient-physician relationship. Subthemes included security, privacy, reliability of data, workload, remuneration, physician obligations, patient misinterpretation of medical information, and electronic communication displacing face-to-face visits. Participants identified 3 key facilitators for adoption of PHR systems: integration with existing electronic health record systems, ease of use without being a burden on either time or money, and offering a demonstrated added value to family practice. This study replicates previously published literature about FP concerns and opinions, and it further identifies remuneration as a potential barrier in Canadian fee-for-service payment models. Participants identified 3 key facilitators, which were suggested for implementation and adoption of PHRs, providing a basis for future research and development of these systems for use in Canadian family practice.