Quantitative and Clinical Analysis of SPECT Image Registration for Epilepsy Studies

This study reports quantitative measurements of the accuracy of two popular voxel-based registration algorithms--Woods' automated image registration algorithm and mutual information correlation--and compares these with conventional surface matching (SM) registration. The registration algorithms...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) Vol. 40; no. 7; pp. 1098 - 1105
Main Authors Brinkmann, Benjamin H, O'Brien, Terence J, Aharon, Shmuel, O'Connor, Michael K, Mullan, Brian P, Hanson, Dennis P, Robb, Richard A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Reston, VA Soc Nuclear Med 01.07.1999
Society of Nuclear Medicine
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study reports quantitative measurements of the accuracy of two popular voxel-based registration algorithms--Woods' automated image registration algorithm and mutual information correlation--and compares these with conventional surface matching (SM) registration. The registration algorithms were compared (15 different matches each) for (a) three-dimensional brain phantom images, (b) an ictal SPECT image from a patient with partial epilepsy matched to itself after modification to simulate changes in the cerebral blood flow pattern and (c) ictal/interictal SPECT images from 15 patients with partial epilepsy. Blinded visual ranking and localization of the subtraction images derived from the patient images were also performed. Both voxel-based registration methods were more accurate than SM registration (P < 0.0005). Automated image registration algorithm was more accurate than mutual information correlation for the computer-simulated ictal/interictal images and the patient ictal/interictal studies (P < 0.05). The subtraction SPECTs from SM were poorer in visual ranking more often than the voxel-based methods (P < 0.05). Voxel intensity-based registration algorithms provide significant improvement in ictal/interictal SPECT registration accuracy and result in a clinically detectable improvement in the subtraction SPECT images.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0161-5505
1535-5667