Population pharmacokinetics of the photodynamic therapy agent 2-[1-hexyloxyethyl]-2-devinyl pyropheophorbide: a in cancer patients

• Published in: Cancer research (Chicago, Ill.) Vol. 63; no. 8; pp. 1806 - 1813
• Main Authors: BELLNIER, David A, GRECO, William R, LOEWEN, Gregory M, NAVA, Hector, OSEROFF, Allan R, PANDEY, Ravindra K, TSUCHIDA, Takaaki, DOUGHERTY, Thomas J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Philadelphia, PA American Association for Cancer Research 15.04.2003
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Barrett Esophagus - blood; Barrett Esophagus - drug therapy; Barrett Esophagus - metabolism; Biological and medical sciences; Blood Proteins - metabolism; Carcinoma, Basal Cell - blood; Carcinoma, Basal Cell - drug therapy; Carcinoma, Basal Cell - metabolism; Chlorophyll - adverse effects; Chlorophyll - analogs & derivatives; Chlorophyll - blood; Chlorophyll - pharmacokinetics; Chlorophyll - therapeutic use; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Esophageal Neoplasms - blood; Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy; Esophageal Neoplasms - metabolism; Humans; Lung Neoplasms - blood; Lung Neoplasms - drug therapy; Lung Neoplasms - metabolism; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Neoplasms - blood; Neoplasms - drug therapy; Neoplasms - metabolism; Photochemotherapy - methods; Photoradiation therapy and photosensitizing agent; Photosensitizing Agents - adverse effects; Photosensitizing Agents - blood; Photosensitizing Agents - pharmacokinetics; Photosensitizing Agents - therapeutic use; Skin - drug effects; Skin Neoplasms - blood; Skin Neoplasms - drug therapy; Skin Neoplasms - metabolism; Treatment with physical agents; Treatment. General aspects; Tumors; Antineoplastic agent; Human; Pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamic relationship; Photodynamic therapy; Intravenous administration; Toxicity; Treatment efficiency; Malignant tumor; Blood plasma; Treatment; Phototoxicity; Clinical trial; Pharmacokinetics; Photosensitizer
• ISSN: 0008-5472; 1538-7445

Photodynamic therapy is an effective and often curative treatment for certain solid tumors. The porphyrin-based photosensitizer Photofrin, the only Food and Drug Administration-approved drug for this therapy, suffers from certain disadvantages: its complex chemical nature; retention by skin (leading to protracted cutaneous photosensitivity); and less than optimal photophysical properties. In this study, we examine the population pharmacokinetics and cutaneous phototoxicity of 2-[1-hexyloxyethyl]-2-devinyl pyropheophorbide-a (HPPH), a chlorin-type photosensitizer with more favorable photophysical properties. HPPH plasma concentration-time data were obtained in 25 patients enrolled in Phase I-II clinical trials for the treatment of partially obstructive esophageal carcinoma, high-grade dysplasia associated with Barrett's esophagus, carcinoma of the lung, or multiple basal cell carcinomas. Doses of 3, 4, 5, or 6 mg/m(2) were administered as 1-h i.v. infusions. The pharmacokinetic data for each patient were fitted with a standard two-compartment (biexponential) model with continuous infusion. The model fitting approach was iteratively reweighted nonlinear regression, with weights equal to the reciprocal of the square of the predicted HPPH plasma concentrations. The complete set of data for all 25 patients was then fitted simultaneously with nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Cutaneous phototoxicity responses were determined, as a function of time after HPPH infusion, following exposure to various doses of light from a solar simulator. The estimates of the population mean (variance) for each parameter were as follows: volume of distribution (V(C)), 2.40 liters/m(2) (0.259); steady-state volume (V(SS)), 9.58 liters/m(2) (11.6); systemic clearance (CL), 0.0296 liter/h/m(2) (0.000094); and distributional clearance (CL(D)), 0.144 liter/h/m(2) (0.00166). These parameters were independent of dose. Clearance increased with age. A relative error model was used for the difference in the raw and fitted data, and the overall coefficient of variation estimate across all of the data was 14.5%. The estimated mean population alpha and beta half-lives (95% confidence interval) were 7.77 h (3.46-17.6 h) and 596 h (120-2951 h), respectively. High-performance liquid chromatography analysis of serum showed no circulating HPPH metabolites, and in vitro incubation of HPPH with human liver microsomal preparations resulted in no metabolite or glucuronic acid-HPPH conjugate production. A minimal skin response to the solar simulator was observed, mostly in patients treated with the highest dose of HPPH, 6 mg/m(2). All of the HPPH pharmacokinetic parameters were consistent with a highly lipophilic agent that is concentrated in plasma and is nearly 100% bound to plasma proteins; this was verified by plasma protein binding studies. Whereas low concentrations of HPPH can be detected in plasma several months after a single infusion, no instances of cutaneous photosensitivity have been noted in these patients. In general, HPPH pharmacokinetic profiles are readily predictable from the global population model. This is the first comprehensive human population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study of a clinical anticancer photodynamic therapy agent.