Perspectives on Surrogate End Points in the Development of Drugs that Reduce the Risk of Cancer

• Published in: Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention Vol. 9; no. 2; pp. 127 - 137
• Main Authors: KELLOFF, G. J, SIGMAN, C. C, JOHNSON, K. M, BOONE, C. W, GREENWALD, P, CROWELL, J. A, HAWK, E. T, DOODY, L. A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Philadelphia, PA American Association for Cancer Research 01.02.2000
• Subjects: Antineoplastic agents; Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use; Biological and medical sciences; Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Chemoprevention; Chemotherapy; Drug Design; Humans; Medical sciences; Neoplasms - prevention & control; Pharmacology. Drug treatments; Research Design; Treatment Outcome; Human; Drug; Biological marker; Genotype; Malignant tumor; Carcinogenesis; Epidemiology; Incidence; Prevention; Chemotherapy; Perspective; Phenotype; Treatment; Bibliographic review; Public health
• ISSN: 1055-9965; 1538-7755

This paper proposes a scientific basis and possible strategy for applying surrogate end points in chemopreventive drug development. The potential surrogate end points for cancer incidence described are both phenotypic (at the tissue, cellular, and molecular levels) and genotypic biomarkers. To establish chemopreventive efficacy in randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials, it is expected that in most cases it will be critical to ensure that virtually all of the biomarker lesions are prevented or that the lesions prevented are those with the potential to progress. This would require that both the phenotype and genotype of the target tissue in agent-treated subjects, especially in any new or remaining precancers, are equivalent to or show less progression than those of placebo-treated subjects. In the National Cancer Institute chemoprevention program, histological modulation of a precancer (intraepithelial neoplasia) has thus far been the primary phenotypic surrogate end point in chemoprevention trials. Additionally, we give high priority to biomarkers measuring specific and general genotypic changes correlating to the carcinogenesis progression model for the targeted cancer ( e.g., progressive genomic instability as measured by loss of heterozygosity or amplification at a specific microsatellite loci). Other potential surrogate end points that may occur earlier in carcinogenesis are being analyzed in these precancers and in nearby normal appearing tissues. These biomarkers include proliferation and differentiation indices, specific gene and general chromosome damage, cell growth regulatory molecules, and biochemical activities ( e.g., enzyme inhibition). Serum biomarkers also may be monitored ( e.g., prostate-specific antigen) because of their accessibility. Potentially chemopreventive drug effects of the test agent also may be measured ( e.g., tissue and serum estrogen levels in studies of steroid aromatase inhibitors). These initial studies are expected to expand the list of validated surrogate end points for future use. Continued discussion and research among the National Cancer Institute, the Food and Drug Administration, industry, and academia are needed to ensure that surrogate end point-based chemoprevention indications are feasible.