Mind the Gap!: Learning Missing Constraints from Annotated Conceptual Model Simulations

Conceptual modeling plays a fundamental role to capture information about complex business domains (e.g., finance, healthcare) and enables semantic interoperability. To fulfill their role, conceptual models must contain the exact set of constraints that represent the worldview of the relevant domain...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Practice of Enterprise Modeling Vol. 432; pp. 64 - 79
Main Authors Fumagalli, Mattia, Sales, Tiago Prince, Guizzardi, Giancarlo
Format Book Chapter Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Springer International Publishing AG 2021
Springer International Publishing
SeriesLecture Notes in Business Information Processing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Conceptual modeling plays a fundamental role to capture information about complex business domains (e.g., finance, healthcare) and enables semantic interoperability. To fulfill their role, conceptual models must contain the exact set of constraints that represent the worldview of the relevant domain stakeholders. However, as empirical results show, modelers are subject to cognitive limitations and biases and, hence, in practice, they produce models that fall short in that respect. Moreover, the process of formally designing conceptual models is notoriously hard and requires expertise that modelers do not always have. This paper falls in the general area concerned with the development of artificial intelligence techniques for the enterprise. In particular, we propose an approach that leverages model finding and inductive logic programming (ILP) techniques. We aim to move towards supporting modelers in identifying domain constraints that are missing from their models, and thus improving their precision w.r.t. their intended worldviews. Firstly, we describe how to use the results produced by the application of model finding as input to an inductive learning process. Secondly, we test the approach with the goal of demonstrating its feasibility and illustrating some key design issues to be considered while using these techniques.
ISBN:3030912787
9783030912789
ISSN:1865-1348
1865-1356
DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-91279-6_5