Vinorelbine and 5-Fluorouracil Bolus and/or Continuous Venous Infusion Plus Levofolinic Acid as Second-line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: an Analysis of Results in Clinical Practice of the Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale (GOIM)

Background: This retrospective study evaluated the activity and toxicity profile of a regimen of vinorelbine and 5-fluorouracil with levofolinic acid, given to a large series of patients with recurrent or refractory metastatic breast cancer after first-line chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: Overal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnticancer research Vol. 26; no. 4B; pp. 3143 - 3150
Main Authors GEBBIA, Vittorio, CARUSO, Michele, BAJARDI, Eugenia, FERRAU, Francesco, BORDONARO, Roberto, TRALONGO, Paolo, BORSELLINO, Nicolo, AJELLO, Rosanna, TIRRITO, Maria Lina, CHIARENZA, Maurizio, VALENZA, Roberto, VERDERAME, Francesco, VARVARA, Francesca, MARRAZZO, Antonio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Attiki International Institute of Anticancer Research 01.07.2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: This retrospective study evaluated the activity and toxicity profile of a regimen of vinorelbine and 5-fluorouracil with levofolinic acid, given to a large series of patients with recurrent or refractory metastatic breast cancer after first-line chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: Overall, 286 evaluable patients were included in the analysis. Two chemotherapy schedules were reviewed: a) the bolus regimen consisted of levofolinic acid 100 mg/m 2 and 5-fluorouracil 375 mg/m 2 , both administered i.v. on days 1,2 and 3, plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m 2 i.v. bolus on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks; b) the infusional regimen of levofolinic acid 100 mg/m 2 given as a 2-hour infusion, followed by 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m 2 i.v. bolus and by 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m 2 administered as 22-hour continuous venous infusion (c.v.i) for 2 days, plus vinorelbine i.v. bolus on days 1 and 8. Results: Overall, twelve patients achieved a complete response (4%; 95%CL 2%-7%) and 115 patients showed a partial response (40%, 95%CL 34%-46%), for an overall response rate of 44% (95CL 39%-50%). Sixty-one patients had stable disease (21%) and 98 patients progressive disease (34%). The tumor growth control rate was 63% (95%CL 60%-71%). Patients with soft tissue metastases as the dominant disease showed the highest response rate (56%), followed by viscera (48%) and bone (33%). The difference in response rate between patients with dominant visceral disease versus those with dominant bone disease was statistically significant (p=0.038). Patients treated with the bolus schedule achieved a 40% overall response rate with a 5% complete response rate, while those who received the infusional regimen had a 48% overall response rate with a 5% complete response rate. This difference was not statistically significant (p=0.164). The overall median duration of objective responses was 8.3 months (range 4-14 months), median time to progression of the all series was 6.1 months (range 2-24 months) and the median overall survival was 14.6 months (range 3-32). There was a statistically significant difference in survival among responder and non-responder patients (p=0.0009). Conclusion: The results of this large off-trial analysis confirmed the clinical activity and adverse-event profile reported in controlled clinical trials of the vinorelbine/ 5-fluorouracil with levofolinic acid regimen in clinical practice. This combination regimen was active with a low toxicity burden and, therefore, represents a good therapeutic choice for patients who require second-line chemotherapy.
ISSN:0250-7005
1791-7530