Carbon-11-Methionine PET Evaluation of Intracerebral Hematoma: Distinguishing Neoplastic from Non-Neoplastic Hematoma

We evaluated whether PET with L-methyl-11C-methionine (11C-methionine) was clinically useful in distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic intracerebral hematoma. We examined eight patients with neoplastic (n = 4) or non-neoplastic (n = 4) intracerebral hematomas between 5 and 68 days after the b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) Vol. 36; no. 12; pp. 2175 - 2179
Main Authors Ogawa, Toshihide, Hatazawa, Jun, Inugami, Atsushi, Murakami, Matsutaro, Fujita, Hideaki, Shimosegawa, Eku, Noguchi, Kyo, Okudera, Toshio, Kanno, Iwao, Uemura, Kazuo, Hadeishi, Hiromu, Sasajima, Toshio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Reston, VA Soc Nuclear Med 01.12.1995
Society of Nuclear Medicine
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We evaluated whether PET with L-methyl-11C-methionine (11C-methionine) was clinically useful in distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic intracerebral hematoma. We examined eight patients with neoplastic (n = 4) or non-neoplastic (n = 4) intracerebral hematomas between 5 and 68 days after the bleeding episode using PET with 11C-methionine (Met-PET). Carbon-11-methionine accumulated in the area surrounding the hematoma in both groups, except in one patient with an acute hypertensive hematoma. Between 22 and 45 days after the ictus, non-neoplastic hematomas showed increased 11C-methionine accumulation largely in accordance with the contrast-enhanced areas on CT or MR images; whereas between 14 and 68 days after bleeding, neoplastic hematomas showed increased 11C-methionine accumulation that extended beyond the contrast-enhanced areas on CT or MR images. The intensity of 11C-methionine accumulation in tumor tissue was greater than that in non-neoplastic hematomas. Preliminary results suggest that Met-PET can distinguish neoplastic from non-neoplastic hematomas on the basis of differences in lesion extent compared with CT or MR findings.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0161-5505
1535-5667