Star–galaxy classification in the Dark Energy Survey Y1 data set
We perform a comparison of different approaches to star–galaxy classification using the broad-band photometric data from Year 1 of the Dark Energy Survey. This is done by performing a wide range of tests with and without external ‘truth’ information, which can be ported to other similar data sets. W...
Saved in:
Published in | Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Vol. 481; no. 4; pp. 5451 - 5469 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford University Press (OUP): Policy P - Oxford Open Option A
01.12.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We perform a comparison of different approaches to star–galaxy classification using the broad-band photometric data from Year 1 of the Dark Energy Survey. This is done by performing a wide range of tests with and without external ‘truth’ information, which can be ported to other similar data sets. We make a broad evaluation of the performance of the classifiers in two science cases with DES data that are most affected by this systematic effect: large-scale structure and Milky Way studies. In general, even though the default morphological classifiers used for DES Y1 cosmology studies are sufficient to maintain a low level of systematic contamination from stellar misclassification, contamination can be reduced to the O(1 per cent) level by using multi-epoch and infrared information from external data sets. For Milky Way studies, the stellar sample can be augmented by |${\sim }20{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| for a given flux limit. Reference catalogues used in this work are available at des.ncsa.illinois.edu/releases/y1a1. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0035-8711 1365-2966 |
DOI: | 10.1093/mnras/sty2579 |