Erratum: EPR imaging of sinapyl alcohol and its application to the study of plant cell wall lignification (Chemical Communications (2021) DOI: 10.1039/D0CC05218C)

• Published in: Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) Vol. 57; no. 3
• Main Authors: Simon, Clemence, Lion, Cédric, Ahouari, Hania, Vezin, Herve, Hawkins, Simon, Biot, Christophe
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Royal Society of Chemistry 11.01.2021
• Series: Chemical Communications
• Subjects: Chemical Sciences; or physical chemistry; Theoretical and
• ISSN: 1359-7345; 1364-548X
• DOI: 10.1039/d0cc90541k

Correction for ‘EPR imaging of sinapyl alcohol and its application to the study of plant cell wall lignification’ by Clémence Simon et al., Chem. Commun., 2021, DOI: 10.1039/D0CC05218C.Some late changes to the published article were not incorporated:Table 1: in the heading “τc (s−1)” should read “τc (s)”.p. 4 – LHS line 16: “are even more immobilized” should be replaced by “reflect immobilized species that are nevertheless more mobile than IIIB”.p. 4 – LHS line 19: “thereby enabling it to enter into denser and/or smaller cell wall spaces that are less accessible to 3” should be replaced by “than 3”The sentences starting, p. 4, LHS line 13, should thus read: “Whereas IVA exhibits a mobility very similar to the previously observed IIIA (Azz = 17 G, τc = 2 and 3 ns, respectively), the two other contributors IVB and IVC to the EPR signal reflect immobilized species that are nevertheless more mobile than IIIB (τc = 46 and 87 ns, respectively). It could be hypothesized that the length of the PEG4 spacer arm and its flexibility allows probe 4 to explore a larger environmental pocket around the tagged lignin site than 3.”The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.