How, and why, science and health researchers read scientific

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 19; no. 1; p. e0297034
• Main Authors: Shiely, Frances, Gallagher, Kerrie, Millar, Seán R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Public Library of Science 22.01.2024
• Subjects: Data entry; Evaluation; Information management; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Ireland; United Kingdom
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297034

The purpose of our study was to determine the order in which science and health researchers read scientific papers, their reasons for doing so and the perceived difficulty and perceived importance of each section. An online survey open to science and health academics and researchers distributed via existing research networks, X (formerly Twitter), and LinkedIn. Almost 90% of respondents self-declared to be experienced in reading research papers. 98.6% of the sample read the abstract first because it provides an overview of the paper and facilitates a decision on continuing to read on or not. Seventy-five percent perceived it to be the easiest to read and 62.4% perceived it to be very important (highest rank on a 5-point Likert scale). The majority of respondents did not read a paper in the IMRAD (Introduction, Methods, Results And Discussion) format. Perceived difficulty and perceived importance influenced reading order. Science and health researchers do not typically read scientific and health research papers in IMRAD format. The more important a respondent perceives a section to be, the more likely they are to read it. The easier a section is perceived, the more likely it will be read. We present recommendations to those teaching the skill of writing scientific papers and reports.