Identification of deficits in appendicitis diagnostic variables in females in South Africa --a descriptive study
Background: Acute appendicitis (AA) is a common surgical emergency and misdiagnosis in females is common given the potential broad differential diagnosis. There is a paucity of data on AA misdiagnosis in developing countries. Therefore, this study aims to describe the routine workup of females with...
Saved in:
Published in | South African journal of surgery Vol. 62; no. 2; p. 216 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Medpharm Publications
01.06.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background: Acute appendicitis (AA) is a common surgical emergency and misdiagnosis in females is common given the potential broad differential diagnosis. There is a paucity of data on AA misdiagnosis in developing countries. Therefore, this study aims to describe the routine workup of females with suspected AA at a South African government hospital and identify factors associated with AA misdiagnosis. Methods: This was a retrospective review of the medical records of all females older than 12 years operated on by general surgeons with a suspected diagnosis of AA over a two-year period. Demographic and clinical data, including examinations and investigations were extracted and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: A total of 180 females were included, and 48 (26.7%) of them were misdiagnosed with AA. Of the misdiagnosed, 22 (46%) had pelvic inflammatory disease, 15 (31%) had a normal appendix, 10 (21%) had ovarian cysts, and one (2%) had endometriosis. Gynaecologic bimanual examination was performed in 123 (68.3%) patients. Twelve (6.7%) patients had a computed tomography scan, and 16 (8.9%) had an abdominal ultrasound. The absence of nausea, vomiting, and anorexia (OR = 2.43; p = 0.023), the presence of cervical excitation tenderness (OR = 4.32; p = 0.009), and adnexal tenderness (OR = 3.06; p = 0.021) were independent predictors of misdiagnosed AA. Conclusion: One in four of our participants was misdiagnosed. We recommend the routine use of clinical parameters and diagnostic imaging to improve the diagnostic accuracy of AA. In resource-limited settings, point-of-care ultrasound should also be considered. Keywords: appendicitis, misdiagnosis, South Africa, appendectomy |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0038-2361 |
DOI: | 10.36303/SAJS.00162 |