Equilibrium products from autothermal processes for generating hydrogen-rich fuel-cell feeds

This work presents thermodynamic analyses of autothermal processes using five fuels—natural gas, methanol, ethanol, dimethyl ether, and gasoline. Autothermal processes combine exothermic and endothermic reactions. The processes considered here couple endothermic steam reforming with exothermic oxida...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of hydrogen energy Vol. 29; no. 10
Main Authors Semelsberger, Troy A., Brown, Lee F., Borup, Rodney L., Inbody, Michael A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier 01.08.2004
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This work presents thermodynamic analyses of autothermal processes using five fuels—natural gas, methanol, ethanol, dimethyl ether, and gasoline. Autothermal processes combine exothermic and endothermic reactions. The processes considered here couple endothermic steam reforming with exothermic oxidation to create hydrogen-rich fuel-cell feeds. Of the fuels treated here, methanol, ethanol, and dimethyl ether are pure compounds. Methane simulates natural gas and a mixture of 7% neopentane, 56% 2,4 dimethyl pentane, 7% cyclohexane, 30% ethyl benzene simulates gasoline. In the computations, sufficient oxygen is fed so the energy generated by the oxidation exactly compensates the energy absorbed by the reforming reactions. The analyses calculate equilibrium product concentrations at temperatures from 300 to 1000 K, pressures from 1 to 5 atm, and water–fuel ratios from 1 to 9 times the stoichiometric value. The thermodynamic calculations in this work say that any of the five fuels, when processed autothermally, can give a product leading to a hydrogen-rich feed for fuel cells. The calculations also show that the oxygen-containing substances (methanol, ethanol, and dimethyl ether) require lower temperatures for effective processing than the non-oxygenated fuels (natural gas and gasoline). Lower reaction temperatures also promote products containing less carbon monoxide, a desirable effect. The presence of significant product CO mandates the choice of optimum conditions, not necessarily conditions that produce the maximum product hydrogen content. Using a simple optimum objective function shows that dimethyl ether has the greatest potential product content, followed by methanol, ethanol, gasoline, and natural gas. The calculations point the way toward rational choices of processes for producing fuel-cell feeds of the necessary quality.
Bibliography:USDOE
LA-UR-03-1046
W-7405-ENG-36
ISSN:0360-3199
1879-3487
DOI:10.1016/S0360-3199(03)00214-3