Paraspinal back muscles in asymptomatic volunteers: quantitative and qualitative analysis using computed tomography

• Published in: BMC musculoskeletal disorders Vol. 21; no. 1
• Main Authors: Khil, Eun Kyung, Choi, Jung-Ah, Hwang, Eunjin, Sidek, Sabrilhakim, Choi, Il
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: BioMed Central Ltd 26.06.2020
• Subjects: CAT scans; Magnetic resonance imaging
• ISSN: 1471-2474; 1471-2474
• DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03432-w

Background To evaluate paraspinal back muscles of asymptomatic subjects using qualitative and quantitative analysis on CT and MRI and correlate the results with demographic data. Methods Twenty-nine asymptomatic subjects were enrolled prospectively (age: mean 34.31, range 23-50; 14 men, 15 women) from August 2016 to April 2017. Qualitative analysis of muscles was done using Goutallier's system on CT and MRI. Quantitative analysis entailed cross sectional area (CSA) on CT and MRI, Hounsfield unit (HU) on CT, fat fraction using two-point Dixon technique on MRI. Three readers independently analyzed the images; intra- and inter-observer agreements were measured. Linear regression and Spearman's analyses were used for correlation with demographic data. Results CSA values were significantly higher in men (p < 0.001). Fat fraction was higher (22.53% vs. 14.35%) and HU lower (36.00 vs. 47.43) in women (p < 0.001). Intra- and inter-observer reliabilities of the two methods were greater than 0.8, except for CSA of L5/S1 on MRI; however, regarding quantitative analysis, decreasing HU and increasing fat fraction were correlated with increasing age, female gender and lower lumbar segment (p < 0.001). Conclusion MRI and CT can be reliably used for qualitative and quantitative analysis of paraspinal back muscles, regarding fat content. Fat fraction and HU showed highest reliabilities. Keywords: Sarcopenia, MRI, Cross-sectional area, Fatty infiltration, Muscle atrophy, Two point Dixon, Fat fraction, Goutallier score, Paraspinal muscle