Clinical and Virological Efficacy of Etravirine Plus Two Active Nucleoside Analogs in an Heterogeneous HIV-Infected Population

Etravirine (ETV) is recommended in combination with a boosted protease inhibitor plus an optimized background regimen for salvage therapy, but there is limited experience with its use in combination with two nucleos(t)ide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). This multicenter study aimed to asse...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 9; no. 5
Main Authors López-Cortés, Luis F, Viciana, Pompeyo, Girón-González, José A, Romero-Palacios, Alberto, Márquez-Solero, Manuel, Ma, López-Ruz, Miguel A, de la Torre-Lima, Javier, Téllez-Pérez, Francisco, Delgado-Fernández, Marcial, Garcia-Lázaro, Milagros, Lozano, Fernando, Mohamed-Balghata, Mohamed O
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Public Library of Science 16.05.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Etravirine (ETV) is recommended in combination with a boosted protease inhibitor plus an optimized background regimen for salvage therapy, but there is limited experience with its use in combination with two nucleos(t)ide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). This multicenter study aimed to assess the efficacy of this combination in two scenarios: group A) subjects without virologic failure on or no experience with non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) switched due to adverse events and group B) subjects switched after a virologic failure on an efavirenz- or nevirapine-based regimen. The primary endpoint was efficacy at 52 weeks analysed by intention-to-treat. Virologic failure was defined as the inability to suppress plasma HIV-RNA to 200 copies/mL in patients who had previously achieved a viral suppression or had an undetectable viral load at inclusion. Two hundred eighty seven patients were included. Treatment efficacy rates in group A and B were 88.0% (CI.sub.95, 83.9-92.1%) and 77.4% (CI.sub.95, 65.0-89.7%), respectively; the rates reached 97.2% (CI.sub.95, 95.1-99.3%) and 90.5% (CI.sub.95, 81.7-99.3), by on-treatment analysis. The once-a-day ETV treatment was as effective as the twice daily dosing regimen. Grade 1-2 adverse events were observed motivating a treatment switch in 4.2% of the subjects. In conclusion, ETV (once- or twice daily) plus two analogs is a suitable, well-tolerated combination both as a switching strategy and after failure with first generation NNRTIs, ensuring full drug activity. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01437241
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0097262