Basel III: Long-term Impact on Economic Performance and Fluctuations
Using a wide range of macroeconomic and econometric models we assess the long‐term economic impact of the Basel III reform. Our main results are the following. (1) The economic costs of the new regulatory standards for bank capital and liquidity are considerably below existing estimates of the benef...
Saved in:
Published in | The Manchester school Vol. 83; no. 2; pp. 217 - 251 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Manchester
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.03.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Using a wide range of macroeconomic and econometric models we assess the long‐term economic impact of the Basel III reform. Our main results are the following. (1) The economic costs of the new regulatory standards for bank capital and liquidity are considerably below existing estimates of the benefits that the reform should have by reducing the probability of banking crises (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2010) ‘An Assessment of the Long‐term Impact of Stronger Capital and Liquidity Requirements’, Basel). (2) The reform dampens output volatility modestly, although there is some heterogeneity across models. (3) The adoption of countercyclical capital buffers can substantially amplify the dampening effect on output volatility. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:MANC12056 istex:D044695920C7A87E9EBAA25593F1B4AA075FDB2C ark:/67375/WNG-LK9VNG06-P Appendix S1. Additional information on the models and details on the individual exercises. Part A. Additional information on the models used for the simulations. Table a1. Main characteristics of the model developed in Gerali et al. (2010). Table bf1. Effects of changes in the capital adequacy ratio on real output (deviations from baseline in percentage points). Table bf2. Effects of liquidity and capital requirements on real output. Table c1. Stochastic shocks. Table ei1. Effects on standard deviations (compared with status quo). Table ei2. Standard deviations (normalized by shock size). Table h1. Properties and relative contribution to the volatility in output growth. Part B. Details on the individual exercises. Table B1. Steady-state output loss due to regulatory tightening. Table B2. Change in output standard deviation due to regulatory tightening. Table B3. Change in output standard deviation due to countercyclical capital buffers. Table B4. Steady-state welfare loss due to regulatory tightening in terms of consumption equivalents: model-based measures. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1463-6786 1467-9957 |
DOI: | 10.1111/manc.12056 |