Is Puyuma a Primary Branch of Austronesian?

Malcom Ross's new theory of early Austronesian phylogeny is examined. I describe evidence that *-en served to mark verbs in undergoer voice, patient subject, in a language ancestral to Puyuma, as well as evidence that * occurs in some verbs in undergoer voice, patient subject perfective, in one...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOceanic linguistics Vol. 49; no. 1; pp. 194 - 204
Main Author Sagart, Laurent
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Honolulu, HI University of Hawaii Press 01.06.2010
University of Hawai'i Press
University Press of Hawaii
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0029-8115
1527-9421
DOI10.1353/ol.0.0070

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Malcom Ross's new theory of early Austronesian phylogeny is examined. I describe evidence that *-en served to mark verbs in undergoer voice, patient subject, in a language ancestral to Puyuma, as well as evidence that * occurs in some verbs in undergoer voice, patient subject perfective, in one sociolect of Nanwang Puyuma. This evidence falsifies the claim that Puyuma reflects an early Austronesian stage at which *-en and * had not yet been reinterpreted from nominalizers into voice markers. It also falsifies the phylogeny that takes that putative innovation as its central event. A hypothetical scenario is offered to account for the replacement of the *-en, *-an, and *Si-(or *Sa-) series of voice markers by the series now found in Puyuma independent verbs.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0029-8115
1527-9421
DOI:10.1353/ol.0.0070