Is Puyuma a Primary Branch of Austronesian?
Malcom Ross's new theory of early Austronesian phylogeny is examined. I describe evidence that *-en served to mark verbs in undergoer voice, patient subject, in a language ancestral to Puyuma, as well as evidence that * occurs in some verbs in undergoer voice, patient subject perfective, in one...
Saved in:
Published in | Oceanic linguistics Vol. 49; no. 1; pp. 194 - 204 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Honolulu, HI
University of Hawaii Press
01.06.2010
University of Hawai'i Press University Press of Hawaii |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0029-8115 1527-9421 |
DOI | 10.1353/ol.0.0070 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Malcom Ross's new theory of early Austronesian phylogeny is examined. I describe evidence that *-en served to mark verbs in undergoer voice, patient subject, in a language ancestral to Puyuma, as well as evidence that * occurs in some verbs in undergoer voice, patient subject perfective, in one sociolect of Nanwang Puyuma. This evidence falsifies the claim that Puyuma reflects an early Austronesian stage at which *-en and * had not yet been reinterpreted from nominalizers into voice markers. It also falsifies the phylogeny that takes that putative innovation as its central event. A hypothetical scenario is offered to account for the replacement of the *-en, *-an, and *Si-(or *Sa-) series of voice markers by the series now found in Puyuma independent verbs. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0029-8115 1527-9421 |
DOI: | 10.1353/ol.0.0070 |