Impact of home care on hospital days : a meta analysis

To examine the impact of home care on hospital days. Search of automated databases covering 1964-1994 using the key words "home care," "hospice," and "healthcare for the elderly." Home care literature review references also were inspected for additional citations. Of 41...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHealth services research Vol. 32; no. 4; pp. 415 - 432
Main Authors HUGHES, S.L, ULASEVICH, A, WEAVER, F.M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ann Arbor, MI Health Administration Press 01.10.1997
Health Research and Educational Trust
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To examine the impact of home care on hospital days. Search of automated databases covering 1964-1994 using the key words "home care," "hospice," and "healthcare for the elderly." Home care literature review references also were inspected for additional citations. Of 412 articles that examined impact on hospital use/cost, those dealing with generic home care that reported hospital admissions/cost and used a comparison group receiving customary care were selected (N = 20). A meta-analytic analysis used secondary data sources between 1967 and 1992. Study characteristics that could have an impact on effect size (i.e., country of origin, study design, disease characteristics of study sample, and length of follow-up) were abstracted and coded to serve as independent variables. Available statistics on hospital days necessary to calculate an effect size were extracted. If necessary information was missing, the authors of the articles were contacted. Effect sizes and homogeneity of variance measures were calculated using Dstat software, weighted for sample size. Overall effect sizes were compared by the study characteristics described above. Effect sizes indicate a small to moderate positive impact of home care in reducing hospital days, ranging from 2.5 to 6 days (effect sizes of -.159 and -.379, respectively), depending on the inclusion of a large quasi-experimental study with a large treatment effect. When this outlier was removed from analysis, the effect size for studies that targeted terminally ill patients exclusively was homogeneous across study subcategories; however, the effect size of studies that targeted nonterminal patients was heterogeneous, indicating that unmeasured variables or interactions account for variability. Although effect sizes were small to moderate, the consistent pattern of reduced hospital days across a majority of studies suggests for the first time that home care has a significant impact on this costly outcome.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0017-9124
1475-6773