A BRAVE NEW WORLD OF TRANSGENDER POLICY
On New Year's Eve 2016, a group of Roman Catholic nuns breathed a heavy sigh of relief just before the clock struck twelve. That night a federal judge placed a nation-wide injunction on a Department of Health and Human Services mandate that would have forced all healthcare plans regulated under...
Saved in:
Published in | Harvard journal of law and public policy Vol. 41; no. 1; pp. 309 - 354 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Cambridge
Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc
01.01.2018
Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | On New Year's Eve 2016, a group of Roman Catholic nuns breathed a heavy sigh of relief just before the clock struck twelve. That night a federal judge placed a nation-wide injunction on a Department of Health and Human Services mandate that would have forced all healthcare plans regulated under Obamacare to cover sex-reassignment procedures, and that would have forced all relevant healthcare workers to perform them. Because of the judge's ruling, the hospital run by the nuns would be safe. So, too, would the health insurance plan they provide to their employees. Think back to Hobby Lobby and the Little Sisters of the Poor, and their victories at the Supreme Court. This Transgender Mandate was the HHS Contraception Mandate on steroids--or hormones, as the case may be. Finally, states and local governments have a role to play. They should not elevate gender identity as a protected class in their own civil rights and antidiscrimination statutes. They should, however, clarify how access to sex-specific facilities is to be governed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0193-4872 2374-6572 |