WHEN DOES EXCLUSIVE DEALING INTENSIFY COMPETITION FOR DISTRIBUTION? COMMENT ON KLEIN AND MURPHY
In a recent article in this Journal, Benjamin Klein and Kevin M. Murphy argue that exclusive dealing contracts are procompetitive because exclusivity intensifies manufacturer competition for distribution and thereby decreases wholesale prices. This is an important procompetitive effect of exclusive...
Saved in:
Published in | Antitrust law journal Vol. 77; no. 1; pp. 205 - 211 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Chicago
American Bar Association
22.06.2010
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In a recent article in this Journal, Benjamin Klein and Kevin M. Murphy argue that exclusive dealing contracts are procompetitive because exclusivity intensifies manufacturer competition for distribution and thereby decreases wholesale prices. This is an important procompetitive effect of exclusive dealing, which explains why the practice can benefit consumers. However, it is important to understand when this effect is important, and when it is not. For that purpose, this note extends the Klein and Murphy model to allow for asymmetric firms, so one firm can be dominant in the market. It is shown that the existence and strength of procompetitive benefits depends on the degree of competition among manufacturers. The larger the market power of the producer that engages in exclusive dealing, the smaller the effect outlined by Klein and Murphy. Hence, the efficiency-enhancing gains from exclusive dealing are least significant precisely when the danger of anticompetitive foreclosure is largest. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-6056 2326-9774 |