Design and management of edge-of-field water control structures for ecological benefits
Stream channel incision often triggers formation of tributary gullies. These gullies erode and extend into fields, generating sediments that pollute downstream waters and degrade aquatic habitats. Standard practice for gully treatment involves damming using an earthen embankment with drainage provid...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of soil and water conservation Vol. 57; no. 3; pp. 151 - 157 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Ankeny, IA
Soil and Water Conservation Society
01.05.2002
Soil & Water Conservation Society |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Stream channel incision often triggers formation of tributary gullies. These gullies erode and extend into fields, generating
sediments that pollute downstream waters and degrade aquatic habitats. Standard practice for gully treatment involves damming
using an earthen embankment with drainage provided by an L-shaped metal pipe. To date, thousands of these structures, also
known as drop pipes, have been constructed in riparian zones adjacent to agricultural areas, but environmental criteria have
played no role in design. Sixteen drop pipe sites (defined as the region of temporary or permanent impoundment created by
the structure) in northwestern Mississippi were sampled for fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals; and physical habitat
characteristics were assessed by sampling vegetation and surveying site topography. Speciose sites (those yielding 65 to 82
vertebrate species) were relatively large [⩾ 0.09 ha (.22 ac)], with a significant pool area. Depauperate sites (only 11 to
20 species captured) were smaller, with no pool area and little woody vegetation. Considerable environmental benefits could
be realized by slightly modified design and management of drop pipe structures. Results of this study suggest habitat benefits
are minimal for sites smaller than 0.1 ha (0.2 ac), for sites lacking woody vegetation, and for sites that do not have at
least 20% of their area below the inlet weir elevation. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0022-4561 1941-3300 |