Effects of an oral hygiene regimen on progression of gingivitis/early periodontitis: A randomized controlled trial

• Published in: Canadian Journal of Dental Hygiene Vol. 55; no. 2; pp. 85 - 94
• Main Authors: Zini, Avraham, Mazor, Sigal, Timm, Hans, Barker, Matthew L, Grender, Julie M, Gerlach, Robert W, Biesbrock, Aaron R
• Format: Journal Article Trade Publication Article
• Language: English
• Published: Ottawa The Canadian Dental Hygienists Association 01.06.2021; Canadian Dental Hygienists Association; CJDH
• Subjects: Bioavailability; Biofilms; Bristles; Cetylpyridinium chloride; Chloride; Clinical trials; Dental floss; Dental plaque; Dental prosthetics; Dentifrices; Disease; Epidemiology; Fluoride treatment; Fluorides; Gingivitis; Health aspects; Hygiene; Inflammation; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Mouthwashes; Oral hygiene; Original Research; Periodontal diseases; Periodontitis; Periodontium; Polytetrafluoroethylene; Population studies; Risk assessment; Soap and cleaning agents industry; Sodium; Sodium fluoride; Stannous fluoride; Toiletries industry; Toothbrushes; Toothpaste; United States; Israel
• ISSN: 1712-171X; 1712-1728

BackgroundPeriodontal disease continues to be prevalent globally, but little clinical research has been undertaken to evaluate the long-term benefits of a daily oral hygiene regimen on progression of gingivitis/early periodontitis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of an oral hygiene regimen (OHR) on the periodontal health of adults in good general health with established gingivitis and early periodontitis over 24 months. MethodsA randomized controlled trial was conducted in adults with established gingivitis, with isolated sites of probing pocket depth >4 mm. Study participants were randomized to the OHR (bioavailable stannous fluoride dentifrice, oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush, cetylpyridinium chloride rinse, and floss; P&G) or usual care products (sodium fluoride dentifrice and manual toothbrush; P&G) groups. At baseline and every 6 months, gingivitis and periodontal measures were assessed and a prophylaxis was conducted. The primary outcome was Gingival Bleeding Index-Bleeding Sites (GBI-BS). Analyses used ANCOVA at 5% significance levels. ResultsA total of 107 individuals were enrolled; 87 completed the study. Mean GBI-BS, Modified Gingival Index, and Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) scores were significantly lower at each visit for the OHR versus usual care group by 28% to 39%, 12% to 18%, and 6% to 13%, respectively (p≤ 0.0009). The magnitude of reduction in median number of ≥2 mm PPD loss events for OHR versus the usual care group at 24 months was 74%. ConclusionLong-term use of the OHR produced significant periodontal health improvements versus the usual care products.