Minimizing Total Completion Time of Batch Scheduling with Nonidentical Job Sizes
This paper concerns the problem of scheduling jobs with unit processing time and nonidentical sizes on single or parallel identical batch machines. The objective is to minimize the total completion time of all jobs. We show that the worst-case ratio of the algorithm based on the bin-packing algorith...
Saved in:
Published in | Combinatorial Optimization and Applications Vol. 10627; pp. 165 - 179 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Book Chapter |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
Springer International Publishing AG
2017
Springer International Publishing |
Series | Lecture Notes in Computer Science |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISBN | 3319711490 9783319711492 |
ISSN | 0302-9743 1611-3349 |
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-71150-8_16 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This paper concerns the problem of scheduling jobs with unit processing time and nonidentical sizes on single or parallel identical batch machines. The objective is to minimize the total completion time of all jobs. We show that the worst-case ratio of the algorithm based on the bin-packing algorithm First Fit Increasing (FFI) lies in the interval [10982,2+22]≈[1.3293,1.7071] $$[\frac{109}{82}, \frac{2+\sqrt{2}}{2}]\approx [1.3293, 1.7071]$$ for the single machine case, and is no more than 6+24≈1.8536 $$\frac{6+\sqrt{2}}{4}\approx 1.8536$$ for the parallel machines case. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11671356, 11271324, 11471286). Original Abstract: This paper concerns the problem of scheduling jobs with unit processing time and nonidentical sizes on single or parallel identical batch machines. The objective is to minimize the total completion time of all jobs. We show that the worst-case ratio of the algorithm based on the bin-packing algorithm First Fit Increasing (FFI) lies in the interval [10982,2+22]≈[1.3293,1.7071]\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$[\frac{109}{82}, \frac{2+\sqrt{2}}{2}]\approx [1.3293, 1.7071]$$\end{document} for the single machine case, and is no more than 6+24≈1.8536\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\frac{6+\sqrt{2}}{4}\approx 1.8536$$\end{document} for the parallel machines case. |
ISBN: | 3319711490 9783319711492 |
ISSN: | 0302-9743 1611-3349 |
DOI: | 10.1007/978-3-319-71150-8_16 |