Minimizing Total Completion Time of Batch Scheduling with Nonidentical Job Sizes

This paper concerns the problem of scheduling jobs with unit processing time and nonidentical sizes on single or parallel identical batch machines. The objective is to minimize the total completion time of all jobs. We show that the worst-case ratio of the algorithm based on the bin-packing algorith...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCombinatorial Optimization and Applications Vol. 10627; pp. 165 - 179
Main Authors Li, Rongqi, Tan, Zhiyi, Zhu, Qianyu
Format Book Chapter
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Springer International Publishing AG 2017
Springer International Publishing
SeriesLecture Notes in Computer Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISBN3319711490
9783319711492
ISSN0302-9743
1611-3349
DOI10.1007/978-3-319-71150-8_16

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper concerns the problem of scheduling jobs with unit processing time and nonidentical sizes on single or parallel identical batch machines. The objective is to minimize the total completion time of all jobs. We show that the worst-case ratio of the algorithm based on the bin-packing algorithm First Fit Increasing (FFI) lies in the interval [10982,2+22]≈[1.3293,1.7071] $$[\frac{109}{82}, \frac{2+\sqrt{2}}{2}]\approx [1.3293, 1.7071]$$ for the single machine case, and is no more than 6+24≈1.8536 $$\frac{6+\sqrt{2}}{4}\approx 1.8536$$ for the parallel machines case.
Bibliography:Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11671356, 11271324, 11471286).
Original Abstract: This paper concerns the problem of scheduling jobs with unit processing time and nonidentical sizes on single or parallel identical batch machines. The objective is to minimize the total completion time of all jobs. We show that the worst-case ratio of the algorithm based on the bin-packing algorithm First Fit Increasing (FFI) lies in the interval [10982,2+22]≈[1.3293,1.7071]\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$[\frac{109}{82}, \frac{2+\sqrt{2}}{2}]\approx [1.3293, 1.7071]$$\end{document} for the single machine case, and is no more than 6+24≈1.8536\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\frac{6+\sqrt{2}}{4}\approx 1.8536$$\end{document} for the parallel machines case.
ISBN:3319711490
9783319711492
ISSN:0302-9743
1611-3349
DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-71150-8_16