Haematological cancer: Where are we now with the treatment of multiple myeloma?

The past decade has seen a revolution in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma. Before this time, the standard treatment approach for younger, fitter patients (with no specific age cut off) able to tolerate the adverse effects was high-dose melphalan with autologous stem-cell transplantati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNature reviews. Clinical oncology Vol. 14; no. 8; p. 461
Main Authors Morgan, Gareth J, Rasche, Leo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Nature Publishing Group 01.08.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1759-4774
1759-4782
1759-4782
DOI10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.82

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The past decade has seen a revolution in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma. Before this time, the standard treatment approach for younger, fitter patients (with no specific age cut off) able to tolerate the adverse effects was high-dose melphalan with autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) rescue, with melphalan and prednisolone (MP) as the established standard therapy for older, less-fit patients less able to tolerate the adverse effects of intensive chemotherapy. The revolution in myeloma outcomes was driven by the introduction of agents, such as bortezomib (Velcade, V) and lenalidomide (Revlimid, R). Both agents have distinct mechanisms of action: bortezomib directly inhibits the proteasome, preventing degradation of key cellular intermediates and resulting in endoplasmic reticulum stress; lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent that modifies the ubiquitin-ligase activity of cereblon, and indirectly targets the haematopoietic transcription factors Ikaros and Aiolos for degradation via the proteasome, both in myeloma cells as well as in immune cells, which enhances the activity of natural killer cells.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Commentary-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1759-4774
1759-4782
1759-4782
DOI:10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.82