Different expression of an S-adenosylmethionine synthetase gene in transgenic tobacco callus modifies alkaloid biosynthesis

Transformed callus cultures of Nicotiana tabacum were generated in which the SAM‐1 gene from Arabidopsis thaliana encoding S‐adenosylmethionine synthetase (SAM‐S), under the control of the 35S promoter, had been integrated. The presence of the SAM‐1 gene was detected in all tested transformants and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiotechnology and bioengineering Vol. 69; no. 1; pp. 11 - 20
Main Authors Belbahri, Lassaad, Chevalier, Laurence, Bensaddek, Lamine, Gillet, Françoise, Fliniaux, Marc-André, Boerjan, Wout, Inzé, Dirk, Thomas, Daniel, Thomasset, Brigitte
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc 05.07.2000
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Transformed callus cultures of Nicotiana tabacum were generated in which the SAM‐1 gene from Arabidopsis thaliana encoding S‐adenosylmethionine synthetase (SAM‐S), under the control of the 35S promoter, had been integrated. The presence of the SAM‐1 gene was detected in all tested transformants and the SAM‐S activity correlated with the accumulation of SAM in the tobacco callus cultures. Three distinct phenotypic classes were identified among the transgenic cell lines in relation to growth of the cells, structure of the calli, and level of SAM. Transgene silencing was observed in several cultivated transgenic calli and this phenomenon was correlated directly with a low level of SAM‐1 mRNA accompanied by a decrease of the SAM‐S activity. The transgenic calli overexpressing the SAM‐1 gene accumulated a high SAM level. The modifications in SAM‐S activity were reflected in the pattern of secondary products pres‐ ent in the different cell lines, thereby demonstrating that the flux through the biosynthetic pathway of a plant secondary product can be modified by means of genetic engineering. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biotechnol Bioeng 69: 11–20, 2000.
Bibliography:ArticleID:BIT2
istex:179FA14FE4D5C0A5EEBAF1194E76C19EC9207002
ark:/67375/WNG-KCRG3WH6-X
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0006-3592
1097-0290
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(20000705)69:1<11::AID-BIT2>3.0.CO;2-J