Correlated Morphometric and Biochemical Studies on the Liver Cell. I. Morphometric Model, Stereologic Methods, and Normal Morphometric Data for Rat Liver
The basic morphological properties of liver cells are defined in the form of a morphometric model to permit integrated quantitative characterization of functionally important parameters. Stereologic methods which allow efficient and reliable quantitative evaluation of sectioned liver tissue are pres...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of cell biology Vol. 42; no. 1; pp. 68 - 91 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Rockefeller University Press
01.07.1969
The Rockefeller University Press |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The basic morphological properties of liver cells are defined in the form of a morphometric model to permit integrated quantitative characterization of functionally important parameters. Stereologic methods which allow efficient and reliable quantitative evaluation of sectioned liver tissue are presented. Material, obtained by a rigorous three-stage sampling procedure from five normal rat livers, is systematically subjected to this analysis at four levels of magnification. This yields quantitative data which are expressed as "densities," i.e. content per 1 ml of tissue, as "specific dimensions" related to 100 g body weight, and as absolute dimensions per average "mononuclear" hepatocyte. Base line data relating to the normal rat liver are presented for the entire spectrum of parameters. As examples, 1 ml of liver tissue contains 169× 106 hepatocyte nuclei, some 90× 106 nuclei of other cells, and 280× 109 mitochondria. Hepatocyte cytoplasm accounts for 77% of liver volume, and the mitochondria for 18%. The surface area of endoplasmic reticulum membranes in 1 ml of liver tissue measures 11 m2 of which are 2/3 of the rough form carrying some 2× 1013 ribosomes. The surface area of mitochondrial cristae in the unit volume is estimated at 6 m2. The validity and applicability of the method are discussed, and the data are compared with available information from other studies. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0021-9525 1540-8140 |
DOI: | 10.1083/jcb.42.1.68 |