Family reunification and the security state
Abrams traces the history of the relationship between family reunification and the national security of the state. Wherein it argues that family rights and the federal immigration power have had three very different relationships such as in the first period, family rights were robust but extraconsti...
Saved in:
Published in | Constitutional commentary Vol. 32; no. 2; pp. 247 - 280 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Minneapolis
Constitutional Commentary, Inc
22.06.2017
University of Minnesota Law School |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abrams traces the history of the relationship between family reunification and the national security of the state. Wherein it argues that family rights and the federal immigration power have had three very different relationships such as in the first period, family rights were robust but extraconstitutional, a bedrock assumption of how American democracy operated and in the second period, courts shifted to conceiving family rights and the immigration power as conflicting with one another, and when pressed they usually found that the government's interest in restricting immigration and protecting its borders outweighed the interests of individual families in reuniting. Also noted the common law concept of family rights and their relation to migration. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0742-7115 2639-7277 |