Further validity evidence of the Behavioral Inhibition Observation System (BIOS)

The Behavioral Inhibition Observation System (BIOS) is a brief clinician-report scale for detecting behavioral inhibition (BI) from direct observation. This study aims to compare the validity coefficients obtained in the natural context of use of the BIOS (i.e., a clinical situation) with those obta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsicothema Vol. 27; no. 4; pp. 416 - 423
Main Authors Ballespí Sola, Sergi, Jané Ballabriga, Maria C, Riba Lloret, Maria D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Spain Colegio Oficial De Psicologos Del Principado De Asturias 2015
Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos (PSICODOC)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The Behavioral Inhibition Observation System (BIOS) is a brief clinician-report scale for detecting behavioral inhibition (BI) from direct observation. This study aims to compare the validity coefficients obtained in the natural context of use of the BIOS (i.e., a clinical situation) with those obtained using the BIOS after standardized observation. The participants were 74 randomly selected preschool children who were exposed to systematic observation. The results indicate excellent internal consistency (α = .91) and moderate to good inter-rater reliability for all items (ICC from .55 to .88). The correlations with observational measures of BI ranged from .40 to .70, and were mostly equivalent to those of the previous study. The correlations with parents', teachers', and clinicians' measures of BI and related constructs ranged from .30 to .60, and were also equivalent to those obtained in the natural context of use of the BIOS (i.e., clinical situation). The validity coefficients obtained with the BIOS in a non-structured natural observation are mostly equivalent to those obtained in an experimental situation, thus supporting that the BIOS is a cost-efficient instrument for measuring BI from observation in a clinical situation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0214-9915
1886-144X
DOI:10.7334/psicothema2015.11