Steam reforming of naphthalene on Ni-Cr/Al2O3 catalysts doped with MgO, TiO2, and La2O3

Magnesium, lanthanum, and titanium oxide‐doped nickel–chromium/alumina catalysts were prepared and their performances assessed in the steam reforming of naphthalene (T: 1,023 K; water‐to‐naphthalene molar ratio: 16, atmospheric pressure, residence time of 0.55 s; and GHSV = 10,080 h−1). Impregnation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAIChE journal Vol. 44; no. 4; pp. 927 - 936
Main Authors Bangala, Denis N., Abatzoglou, Nicolas, Chornet, Esteban
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.04.1998
Wiley Subscription Services
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Magnesium, lanthanum, and titanium oxide‐doped nickel–chromium/alumina catalysts were prepared and their performances assessed in the steam reforming of naphthalene (T: 1,023 K; water‐to‐naphthalene molar ratio: 16, atmospheric pressure, residence time of 0.55 s; and GHSV = 10,080 h−1). Impregnation of nickel and chromium in MgO‐ and La2O3‐doped alumina gave the most active, stable catalysts. Nickel was active in aromatic ring opening, while chromium inhibited the encapsulation of the nickel clystallites by inactive carbon filaments. The use of MgO had a signifkant effect on the robustness of catalyst due to the formation of MgAl2O4 spinelphase. La2O3 was necessaly to drive the reaction toward total gasification. The addition of TiO2 gave poor activity and a soft catalyst. Some of the catalyst preparations were characterized before and after reaction by XRD, SEM, DTA, and surface measurements. The physical and catalytic properties are discussed in light of these characterizations. The catalyst optimized during this study showed high clystallite dispersion, excellent crushing strength, and good thermal stability. When comparing the data obtained using Ni/Al2O3 with Ni–Cr/Al203·MgO·La2O3, it is clear that the improved catalyst reached higher conversion and gas yield performances.
Bibliography:ArticleID:AIC690440418
ark:/67375/WNG-11CP8MMJ-Z
istex:7876FC516B9E57650008D7E47251F08B64198495
ISSN:0001-1541
1547-5905
DOI:10.1002/aic.690440418