An Update on the Comparison of MIP, CP and Hybrid Approaches for Mixed Resource Allocation and Scheduling
We consider a well known resource allocation and scheduling problem for which different approaches like mixed-integer programming (MIP), constraint programming (CP), constraint integer programming (CIP), logic-based Benders decompositions (LBBD) and SAT-modulo theories (SMT) have been proposed and e...
Saved in:
Published in | Integration of Constraint Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Operations Research Vol. 10848; pp. 403 - 411 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Book Chapter |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
Springer International Publishing AG
01.01.2018
Springer International Publishing |
Series | Lecture Notes in Computer Science |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISBN | 9783319930305 3319930303 |
ISSN | 0302-9743 1611-3349 |
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-93031-2_29 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We consider a well known resource allocation and scheduling problem for which different approaches like mixed-integer programming (MIP), constraint programming (CP), constraint integer programming (CIP), logic-based Benders decompositions (LBBD) and SAT-modulo theories (SMT) have been proposed and experimentally compared in the last decade. Thanks to the recent improvements in CP Optimizer, a commercial CP solver for solving generic scheduling problems, we show that a standalone tiny CP model can out-perform all previous approaches and close all the 335 instances of the benchmark. The article explains which components of the automatic search of CP Optimizer are responsible for this success. We finally propose an extension of the original benchmark with larger and more challenging instances. |
---|---|
ISBN: | 9783319930305 3319930303 |
ISSN: | 0302-9743 1611-3349 |
DOI: | 10.1007/978-3-319-93031-2_29 |