Composing a Balanced and Effective Board to Meet New Governance Mandates

The enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the recent adoption of new corporate governance listing standards by the major American securities markets have resulted in a number of prescriptions that influence the selection of directors of U. S. public companies. These requirements are in som...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Business Lawyer Vol. 59; no. 2; pp. 421 - 452
Main Authors Olson, John F., Adams, Michael T.
Format Journal Article Trade Publication Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chicago Section of Business Law of the American Bar Association 01.02.2004
American Bar Association
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the recent adoption of new corporate governance listing standards by the major American securities markets have resulted in a number of prescriptions that influence the selection of directors of U. S. public companies. These requirements are in some respects inconsistent with the traditional agency role of the monitoring board and, more important, may conflict with optimal functioning of the board as a group. The authors survey the literature on the role of the board and board dynamics, examine the new constraints and their impact on director qualification and selection, and offer ten practical suggestions for director selection that will help nominating and governance committees of public companies to assemble boards of directors that will effectively perform their critical monitoring functions in the new regulatory environment.
ISSN:0007-6899
2164-1838