Kuvalayamālā:Roman jaina de 779 composé par Uddyotanasūri, vol. 1:Étude; vol II:Traduction et annotations

Upadhye supplemented his edition eleven years later with an invaluable analysis and notes, but in general scholarship on the KM has been patchy, concentrating on the evidence which it provides for less common Prakrit dialects such as Paiaâcï or attempting to extract evidence of realia which can depl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of American Oriental Society Vol. 132; no. 2; pp. 305 - 306
Main Author Dundas, Paul
Format Book Review
LanguageEnglish
Published Ann Arbor American Oriental Society 01.06.2012
Subjects
Ancient languages
Dialects
Review of Books
Translations
New York
India
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Upadhye supplemented his edition eleven years later with an invaluable analysis and notes, but in general scholarship on the KM has been patchy, concentrating on the evidence which it provides for less common Prakrit dialects such as Paiaâcï or attempting to extract evidence of realia which can deployed in the reconstruction of Indian socio-economic history in the late first millennium c.E. Certainly there has hitherto been no serious attempt to assess the KM as a sophisticated literary work which evinces a marked degree of self-awareness of its own Activity.
ISSN:0003-0279
2169-2289
DOI:10.7817/jameroriesoci.132.2.0305