Accuracy of papilledema and pseudopapilledema detection: a multispecialty study

Present trends in medical care suggest that primary care physicians will exert increasing control over patient access to medical specialty consultation and diagnostic testing. Therefore, it is important to determine whether primary care physicians can reliably identify papilledema. A prospective stu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of family practice Vol. 33; no. 4; p. 381
Main Authors Johnson, L N, Hepler, R S, Bartholomew, M J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.10.1991
Subjects
Clinical Competence
Family Practice
Humans
Medicine
Neurology
Neurosurgery
Ophthalmology
Papilledema - diagnosis
Sensitivity and Specificity
Specialization
United States
United States
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

More Information
Summary:Present trends in medical care suggest that primary care physicians will exert increasing control over patient access to medical specialty consultation and diagnostic testing. Therefore, it is important to determine whether primary care physicians can reliably identify papilledema. A prospective study involving 429 physicians was undertaken to assess the accuracy of papilledema and pseudopapilledema detection by five groups of physicians, family practice physicians, neurologists, neuro-ophthalmologists, neurosurgeons, and ophthalmologists. Neuro-ophthalmologists and ophthalmologists did better than family physicians, neurologists, and neurosurgeons in identifying both papilledema and pseudopapilledema (P less than .05). Neuro-ophthalmologists more accurately identified pseudopapilledema than all other groups in the study (P less than .05). Family physicians did as well as, or better than, neurologists and neurosurgeons in identifying all classifications of acute and chronic papilledema defined in the study. Family physicians did not perform as well as the other four groups in differentiating pseudopapilledema from papilledema (P less than .05). Although the sensitivity of detecting papilledema was high (84.5%) for family physicians, the specificity was low (59.3%). Preliminary data indicate that family physicians with prior exposure to clinical ophthalmology in medical school did better than those who had not had training. It is possible that additional exposure to clinical ophthalmology during residency training might yield improved performance.
ISSN:0094-3509