Changes in the size distribution of U.S. banks: 1960-2005

In 1960, there were nearly 13,000 independent banks. By 2005, the number had dropped in half, to about 6,500. In 1960, the ten largest banks held 21% of the banking industry's assets. By 2005, this share had grown to almost 60%. A great deal of these changes started during the deregulation of t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEconomic quarterly - Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Vol. 92; no. 4; pp. 291 - 316
Main Authors Janicki, Hubert P, Prescott, Edward Simpson
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Richmond Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond 01.10.2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In 1960, there were nearly 13,000 independent banks. By 2005, the number had dropped in half, to about 6,500. In 1960, the ten largest banks held 21% of the banking industry's assets. By 2005, this share had grown to almost 60%. A great deal of these changes started during the deregulation of the 1980s and 1990s. This article documents the extent of this change. It also documents the change in bank size dynamics, that is, the entry and exit of banks and the movement of banks through the size distribution. In many industries, the distribution of firm size is highly skewed to the right, that is, there are many small firms and a few large ones. The size distribution of banks has always been skewed, but it has become more so since the 1960s. A Markov model allows for straightforward predictions about changes to a size distribution. The researchers found that the lognormal distribution poorly fits the right tail of the size distribution.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1069-7225
2163-4556