Answers for Self and Proxy – Using Eye Tracking to Uncover Respondent Burden and Usability Issues in Online Questionnaires

In a study of the American Community Survey online instrument, we assessed how people answered questions about themselves and other individuals living in their household using eye-tracking data and other qualitative measures. This paper focuses on the number of fixations (whether participants looked...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inUniversal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Design for All and Accessibility Practice pp. 590 - 600
Main Authors Olmsted-Hawala, Erica, Holland, Temika, Nichols, Elizabeth
Format Book Chapter
LanguageEnglish
Published Cham Springer International Publishing
SeriesLecture Notes in Computer Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In a study of the American Community Survey online instrument, we assessed how people answered questions about themselves and other individuals living in their household using eye-tracking data and other qualitative measures. This paper focuses on the number of fixations (whether participants looked at specific areas of the screen), fixation duration (how long participants looked at the questions and answers), and number of unique visits (whether participants rechecked the question and answer options). Results showed that for age, date of birth and employment duty questions participants had more fixations and unique visit counts, and spent more time on the screen when answering about unrelated members of their household than when answering about themselves. Differing eye movements for proxy reporting suggest that answering some survey questions for other unrelated people poses more burden on respondents than answering about oneself. However, not all questions showed this tendency, so eye tracking alone is not enough to detect burden.
Bibliography:Disclaimer: This report is released to inform interested parties of research and to encourage discussion. Any views expressed on the methodological issues are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the U.S. Census Bureau.
ISBN:9783319075082
331907508X
ISSN:0302-9743
1611-3349
DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-07509-9_56