Comparison of mammography and ultrasound findings in the followup of patients with breast cancer treated with segmental mastectomy followed by intraoperative electron radiotherapy versus external whole breast radiotherapy

• Published in: Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) Vol. 29; no. 6; p. 761
• Main Authors: Tutar, Burcin, Icten, Gul Esen, Altinok, Ayse, Eroz, Seda, Bese, Nuran, Uras, Cihan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Galenos Yayinevi Tic. Ltd 01.11.2023
• Subjects: Breast; Breast cancer; Care and treatment; Comparative analysis; Diagnosis; Intraoperative radiotherapy; Mammography; Mastectomy; Patient outcomes; Ultrasonic imaging; Turkey
• ISSN: 1305-3825; 1305-3612
• DOI: 10.4274/dir.2023.211218

PURPOSE This study aims to describe imaging findings in patients treated with intraoperative electron radiotherapy and compare them with those detected in patients treated with external whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT). METHODS The study population consisted of 25 patients who received intraoperative radiotherapy [IORT (21 Gy)] as single-dose radiotherapy and a control group of 25 patients who received WBRT at the same institution. Mammography and ultrasound (US) findings were divided into three groups: minor, intermediate, and advanced. On mammography, mass lesions were considered advanced, and asymmetries or architectural distortions were considered intermediate. Oil cysts, linear scars, and the increase in parenchymal density were considered minor findings. On US, irregular non-mass lesions were considered advanced, and circumscribed hypoechoic lesions or planar irregular scars with shadowing were considered intermediate. Oil cysts, fluid collections, or linear scars were considered minor findings. RESULTS On mammography, skin thickening (P = 0.001), edema (P < 0.001), increased parenchymal density (P < 0.001), dystrophic calcifications (P = 0.045), and scar/distortion (P = 0.005) were significantly more common in the WBRT group. On US, irregular non-mass lesions, which made interpretation considerably difficult, were significantly more common in the IORT group (P = 0.004). Dominant US findings were fluid collections and postoperative linear or planar scars in the WBRT group. Minor findings were more common in low-density breasts, and major findings (intermediate and advanced) were more common in high-density breasts on both mammographies (P = 0.011) and US (P = 0.027) in the IORT group. CONCLUSION Ill-defined non-mass lesions detected on US in the IORT group have not been defined previously. Radiologists should be aware of these lesions because they can be confusing, especially in early follow-up studies. This study has found that minor findings are seen more frequently in low-density breasts, while major findings are more common in high-density breasts in the IORT group. This has not been reported before, and further studies with more cases are needed to verify these results. KEYWORDS Breast, intraoperative radiotherapy, whole breast radiotherapy, mammography, ultrasonography