Kick-starting research in newly emergent universities: why faculty do not apply for research development 'seed' funding at the University of Technology, Jamaica

• Published in: The journal of research administration Vol. 36; no. 1-2; pp. 56 - 64
• Main Authors: Onyefulu, Cynthia C, Ogunrinade, A.F
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Society of Research Administrators, Inc 01.04.2005
• Subjects: United States; Universities and colleges; United States
• ISSN: 1539-1590; 2573-7104

Newly-emergent universities face a plethora of problems which bedevil development efforts and inhibit the building of a research culture almost from scratch. These challenges arise from lack of human and material resources, lack of research infrastructure, lack of role models and mentors and general capacity problems often lumped together and described as a general lack of a "research culture." In order to redress this lack of a research culture and encourage the building of an active research enterprise, the 10-year old University of Technology, Jamaica introduced a seed grant mechanism in 1998, since re-designated the Research Development Fund (RDF) to encourage staff of the university to pursue research activity. Despite this initiative, response to the funding has been lackluster. In this paper, we investigate the reasons why academic staff at the University have not utilized this promising facility and what could be done to encourage more active participation in research. Out of the 66 academic staff who responded to a questionnaire survey, 74.2% claimed to be aware of the available funding for research in the university but only 10.6% had applied for funding under the RDF mechanism between 1999 and 2004. Of those who applied, only half were successful. However, about a third of the respondents have been utilizing other funds for research outside of the RDF. The reasons given for not applying for the fund include lack of time to write the proposal or conduct the study (46.9%), the bureaucracy surrounding the release of the fund (22.8%), the paucity of information in the proposal form and the tedious application process (19.6%) while 7.5% of the respondents were deterred by fear of being rejected. However, such reasons may just underline the need for more capacity building efforts, research training and mentorship at all levels. A number of suggestions were made by the respondents in order to encourage increased participation in the application process. These include a more customer-friendly application process, reduction in teaching load in favor of research, research mentorship and the reduction in staff participation at meetings and other administrative duties.