Can Prompt Corrective Action Rules Work in the Developing World?
A major weakness of bank regulation is "regulatory forbearance," which is partly attributable to the scope for discretionary intervention by bank regulators. Therefore, bank regulation might be improved by subjecting intervention policy to a set of rules, such as the "Prompt Correctiv...
Saved in:
Published in | African Business Finance and Development Policy pp. 47 - 68 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Book Chapter |
Language | English |
Published |
United Kingdom
Routledge
2003
Taylor & Francis Group |
Edition | 1 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | A major weakness of bank regulation is "regulatory forbearance," which is partly attributable to the scope for discretionary intervention by bank regulators. Therefore, bank regulation might be improved by subjecting intervention policy to a set of rules, such as the "Prompt Corrective Action" (PCA) rules in the US. The introduction of PCA rules is under consideration in a number of developing countries (DCs), stimulated by costly bank failures. This paper examines the potential benefits and feasibility of incorporating PCA rules into banking regulation in DCs. The paper concludes that PCA rules can improve bank regulation in DCs if introduced as part of a comprehensive set of prudential reforms which strengthens the operational independence of the bank regulators, improves their on-site examination capacities,48 strengthens accounting standards and raises public and political understanding of the need for strong and impartial bank regulation. [Article copies available for a fee from The Haworth Document Delivery Service: 1-800-HAWORTH. E-mail address: <docdelivery@haworthpress.com> Website: <http://www.HaworthPress.com> © 2003 by The Haworth Press, Inc. All rights reserved.] |
---|---|
ISBN: | 0789020858 9780789020857 078902084X 9780789020840 |
DOI: | 10.4324/9781315880822-4 |