Appropriate pC[O.sub.2] treatments in ocean acidification experiments
Experiments in which organisms are reared in treatments simulating current and future pC[O.sub.2] concentrations are critical for ocean acidification (OA) research. The majority of OA exposure experiments use average atmospheric pC[O.sub.2] levels as a baseline treatment. We conducted an ecoregion-s...
Saved in:
Published in | Marine biology Vol. 160; no. 8; p. 1807 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Springer
01.08.2013
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Experiments in which organisms are reared in treatments simulating current and future pC[O.sub.2] concentrations are critical for ocean acidification (OA) research. The majority of OA exposure experiments use average atmospheric pC[O.sub.2] levels as a baseline treatment. We conducted an ecoregion-scale analysis of global carbon chemistry datasets. For many locales, atmospheric pC[O.sub.2] levels are not an appropriate characterization of marine carbon chemistry. We argue that atmospheric pC[O.sub.2] should be disregarded when setting baseline treatment conditions and experimental design should rely on measurements of carbon chemistry in a study subject's habitat. As carbon chemistry conditions vary with space and time, we suggest using a range of pC[O.sub.2] values as a control rather than a single value. We illustrate this issue with data on the habitat of Euphausia pacifica, which currently lives in waters with a pC[O.sub.2] around 900 µatm, a concentration much higher than the current global atmospheric mean. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0025-3162 1432-1793 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00227-012-2052-0 |