COOL itself is not ruled illegal by WTO but finds label wording to be a problem

S&S writes: "The AB in the COOL dispute found that the detrimental impact of COOL on imported livestock does not stem exclusively from a legitimate regulatory objective but instead reflects discrimination, thus violating Article 2.1 of the TBT Agreement.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSouthwest Farm Press
Main Authors Ray, Darryl, Schaffer, Howard
Format Magazine Article Trade Publication Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Clarksdale Penton Media, Inc., Penton Business Media, Inc. and their subsidiaries 27.03.2013
Informa
Subjects
Agricultural policy
Compliance
Labels
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:S&S writes: "The AB in the COOL dispute found that the detrimental impact of COOL on imported livestock does not stem exclusively from a legitimate regulatory objective but instead reflects discrimination, thus violating Article 2.1 of the TBT Agreement.
ISSN:0194-0945
2161-9301