open and shut case?

Some policy makers and practitioners are starting to question the fact that people with both health and social care needs can receive direct payments for the latter but not for the former. Yet the NHS now emphasises issues such as "the expert patient", "long-term conditions" and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCommunity care (Haywards Heath, England) no. 1592; pp. 34 - 35
Main Authors Glasby, Jon, Hasler, Frances
Format Magazine Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Sutton Mark Allen Group 29.09.2005
Mark Allen Group Ltd
Subjects
Analysis
Care delivery
Direct payments
Equity
Finance
Health care
Health care expenditures
Management
Patients
Payment
Payment systems
Powers and duties
Seminars
Social care
Social service
Social services
United Kingdom
United Kingdom > UK
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Some policy makers and practitioners are starting to question the fact that people with both health and social care needs can receive direct payments for the latter but not for the former. Yet the NHS now emphasises issues such as "the expert patient", "long-term conditions" and greater "personalisation" of services - all of which could benefit from the choice and control offered by direct payments.
Bibliography:content type line 24
ObjectType-Feature-1
SourceType-Magazines-1
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0307-5508