Diversity increases carbon storage and tree productivity in Spanish forests
AIM: Biodiversity loss could reduce primary productivity and the carbon storage provided by forests; however, the mechanisms underpinning the effects of biodiversity on multiple ecosystem functions are not completely understood. Spanish forests are of particular interest because of the broad variati...
Saved in:
Published in | Global ecology and biogeography Vol. 23; no. 3; pp. 311 - 322 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.03.2014
John Wiley & Sons Ltd Blackwell Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | AIM: Biodiversity loss could reduce primary productivity and the carbon storage provided by forests; however, the mechanisms underpinning the effects of biodiversity on multiple ecosystem functions are not completely understood. Spanish forests are of particular interest because of the broad variation in environmental conditions and management history. We tested for the existence of a relationship between diversity effects and both carbon storage and tree productivity, and examined the relative importance of complementarity and selection mechanisms in a wide variety of forests, from cold deciduous Atlantic to xeric Mediterranean evergreen forests. LOCATION: Continental Spain. METHODS: We used c. 54,000 plots of the Spanish Forest Inventory and maximum likelihood techniques to quantify how climate, stand structure and diversity shape carbon storage and tree productivity. Diversity effects included both complementarity and selection mechanisms, measured respectively through functional diversity and functional identity measures. RESULTS: Diversity had a significant effect on both carbon storage and tree productivity, even when controlling for confounding factors of climate and stand structure. A consistent positive effect of functional diversity on carbon storage and tree productivity was observed in all seven forest types studied. This relationship was not linear, and the largest changes in carbon storage and tree productivity were observed at low levels of functional diversity. However, the importance of complementarity effects was not consistent with the productivity of different forest types. Selection effects were particularly important in deciduous and Mediterranean pine forests, but had very little effect on mountain pines. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: We found a generally positive effect of diversity on carbon storage and tree productivity, supported by both complementarity and selection mechanisms. Thus, both functionally diverse forests and functionally important species should be maintained to adequately preserve and promote key ecosystem functions such as carbon storage and tree productivity. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/geb.12126 FUNDIV - No. ENV.2010.2.1.4-1 FPU fellowship - No. AP2008-01325 ark:/67375/WNG-XFZPGMLC-3 ArticleID:GEB12126 Figure S1 Observed versus predicted carbon storage for the best model in each forest type.Figure S2 Predicted potential carbon storage as function of mean annual temperature, water deficit, tree density and tree height coefficient of variation for each forest type.Figure S3 Observed versus predicted tree productivity for the best model in each forest type.Figure S4 Predicted potential tree productivity as function of mean annual temperature, water deficit, tree density and tree height coefficient of variation for each forest type.Figure S5 Predicted potential carbon storage and tree productivity as function of tree species richness.Table S1 List of species names and family, forest type and species used to calculate the carbon storage and tree productivity.Table S2 Description of the potential predictor variables of carbon storage and tree productivity.Table S3 Functional traits used to compute trait-based diversity indices.Table S4 Mean values of carbon storage, tree productivity and the rest of the predictor variables included in the best model. Number of plots and species composition of each forest type are also given.Table S5 Parameter estimates and two-unit support intervals for the most parsimonious total carbon storage model for each of the seven forest types defined.Table S6 Parameter estimates and two-unit support intervals for the most parsimonious tree productivity model for each of the seven forest types defined.Appendix S1 Further details regarding the methods used and variable selection. INTERBOS3-CGL2008-04503-C03-03 istex:39DD33EA0EFC0072B7A42CAB3ADC6A68D9871F73 SUM2008-00004-C03-01 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1466-822X 1466-8238 1466-822X |
DOI: | 10.1111/geb.12126 |