Multiscale analysis of temporal variability of soil CO₂ production as influenced by weather and vegetation
Ecosystem processes are influenced by weather and climatic perturbations at multiple temporal scales with a large range of amplitudes and phases. Technological advances of automated biometeorological measurements provide the opportunity to apply spectral methods on continuous time series to identify...
Saved in:
Published in | Global change biology Vol. 16; no. 5; pp. 1589 - 1605 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.05.2010
Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley-Blackwell |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Ecosystem processes are influenced by weather and climatic perturbations at multiple temporal scales with a large range of amplitudes and phases. Technological advances of automated biometeorological measurements provide the opportunity to apply spectral methods on continuous time series to identify differences in amplitudes and phases and relationships with weather variation. Here we used wavelet coherence analysis to study the temporal covariance between soil CO₂ production and soil temperature, soil moisture, and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). Continuous (hourly average) data were acquired over 2 years among three vegetation types in a semiarid mixed temperate forest. We showed that soil temperature and soil moisture influence soil CO₂ production differently at multiple periods (e.g. hours, days, weeks, months, years), especially after rain pulse events. Our results provide information about the periodicity of soil CO₂ production among vegetation types, and provide insights about processes controlling CO₂ production through the study of phase relationships between two time series (e.g. soil CO₂ production and PAR). We tested the performance of empirical models of soil CO₂ production using the continuous wavelet transform. These models, built around soil temperature and moisture, failed at multiple periods across the measured dates, suggesting that empirical models should include other factors that regulate soil CO₂ production at different temporal scales. Our results add a new dimension for the analysis of continuous time series of biometeorological measurements and model testing, which will prove useful for analysis of increasing sensor data obtained by environmental networks. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02111.x istex:A589C4F0ED2892C41C269C70291A03DBBC243592 ArticleID:GCB2111 ark:/67375/WNG-MVKJN867-N ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1354-1013 1365-2486 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02111.x |