Benefits of mixing grasses and legumes for herbage yield and nutritive value in Northern Europe and Canada

Increased biodiversity may improve ecosystem services, including herbage yield. A mixture experiment was carried out at five sites in Northern Europe and one in Canada to investigate whether mixtures of grasses and legumes would give higher herbage yield than monocultures. Resistance of the mixtures...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGrass and forage science Vol. 69; no. 2; pp. 229 - 240
Main Authors Sturludóttir, E, Brophy, C, Bélanger, G, Gustavsson, A.‐M, Jørgensen, M, Lunnan, T, Helgadóttir, Á
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Science 01.06.2014
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Increased biodiversity may improve ecosystem services, including herbage yield. A mixture experiment was carried out at five sites in Northern Europe and one in Canada to investigate whether mixtures of grasses and legumes would give higher herbage yield than monocultures. Resistance of the mixtures to weed invasion and nutritive value of the herbage were also investigated. The experimental layout followed a simplex design, where four species differing in specific functional traits, timothy (Phleum pratense L.), smooth meadow grass (Poa pratensis L.), red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) and white clover (Trifolium repens L.), were grown in monocultures and eleven different mixtures with systematically varying proportions of the four species. Positive diversity effects (DE) were observed, leading to greater herbage dry‐matter (DM) yield in mixtures than expected from species sown in monocultures. For centroid mixtures, the DE generated on average an additional 32, 25 and 21% of the DM yield than would be expected from the monocultures in the first, second and third year respectively. On average, the mixtures were 9, 15 and 7% more productive than the most productive monoculture (transgressive overyielding) in the first, second and third year respectively. These benefits persisted over the three harvest years of the experiment and were consistent among most sites. This positive effect was not accompanied by a reduction in herbage digestibility and crude protein concentration that is usually observed with increased DM yield. Mixtures also reduced the invasion of weeds to <5% of herbage yield compared to monocultures (10–60% of herbage yield).
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12037
Agricultural Productivity Fund in Iceland
09/RFP/EOB2546
ark:/67375/WNG-LV6D5GPR-2
Science Foundation Ireland
Icelandic Research Fund in Iceland
INTERREG KolArctic
The Norwegian Barents Secretariat County governors and Agriculture of Nordland, Troms and Finnmark in Norway
istex:9B1FDF5FDC6FEE5E8769DC5D354372A09197E608
EU Commission
CL Behms Foundation in Sweden
ArticleID:GFS12037
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0142-5242
1365-2494
1365-2494
DOI:10.1111/gfs.12037