GIS: a tool for siting farm ponds

A geographic information system (GIS) application was developed for identifying potential sites for a farm pond to serve as a permanent livestock watering system amenable to rotational grazing and independent of ephemeral streams. The approach consisted of the following components: (1) developing th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of soil and water conservation Vol. 51; no. 5; pp. 434 - 438
Main Authors Vorhauer, C.F. (Texas A and M University, College Station.), Hamlett, J.M
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Ankeny, IA Soil and Water Conservation Society 01.09.1996
Soil & Water Conservation Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A geographic information system (GIS) application was developed for identifying potential sites for a farm pond to serve as a permanent livestock watering system amenable to rotational grazing and independent of ephemeral streams. The approach consisted of the following components: (1) developing the digitized database and attribute files, (2) locating potential sites based on topography, land use, and soil, (3) conducting a water balance for each potential site, (4) ranking the potential sites as to desirability, and (5) recommending ways to enhance water harvesting capabilities. The GIS screening produced maps showing the locations of suitable pond sites. Based on these maps, the watershed of each site was determined and the potential runoff to the pond was predicted using the Natural Resources Conservation Service Curve Number Method. Spreadsheet calculations were used for performing a water balance. Potential pond sites were selected for further consideration based on a slope of 8% or less, soil suitable for aquifer-fed ponds, and land areas not used for homesteads, croplands, utilities, roads, or streams. Using water balance calculations for 10 years of simulated climate data, the potential amount of water harvested at each site was determined. Using water harvesting potential, location, and negative impacts of a pond at a specific site as criteria, nine sites were ranked as most desirable.
Bibliography:C30
E20
9633757
P10
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-4561
1941-3300