Comparison of three models to estimate breeding values for percentage of loin intramuscular fat in Duroc swine

• Published in: Journal of animal science Vol. 83; no. 4; pp. 750 - 756
• Main Authors: Newcom, D. W, Baas, T. J, Stalder, K. J, Schwab, C. R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Savoy, IL Am Soc Animal Sci 01.04.2005; American Society of Animal Science
• Subjects: Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology; Adipose Tissue - diagnostic imaging; animal breeding; Animal Husbandry - methods; Animal productions; Animals; Biological and medical sciences; boars; Body Composition - genetics; body fat; Breeding - statistics & numerical data; breeding value; carcass composition; Duroc; Epstein-Barr virus; Female; Food industries; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; gilts; loins (meat cut); Male; Meat - standards; Meat and meat product industries; meat quality; Models, Genetic; Muscle, Skeletal - anatomy & histology; Muscle, Skeletal - diagnostic imaging; Phenotype; pork; selection criteria; selection response; Selection, Genetic; Statistics as Topic; Swine - anatomy & histology; Swine - genetics; Terrestrial animal productions; Ultrasonography; Vertebrates; Pigs; Breeding Value Estimation; Farming animal; Selection; Meat product; Loin; Pig; Vertebrata; Meat animals; Mammalia; Fat; Intramuscular Fat Percent; Models; Artiodactyla; Breeding value; Ungulata
• ISSN: 0021-8812; 1525-3163
• DOI: 10.2527/2005.834750x

Three selection models were evaluated to compare selection candidate rankings based on EBV and to evaluate subsequent effects of model-derived EBV on the selection differential and expected genetic response in the population. Data were collected from carcass- and ultrasound-derived estimates of loin i.m. fat percent (IMF) in a population of Duroc swine under selection to increase IMF. The models compared were Model 1, a two-trait animal model used in the selection experiment that included ultrasound IMF from all pigs scanned and carcass IMF from pigs slaughtered to estimate breeding values for both carcass (C1) and ultrasound IMF (U1); Model 2, a single-trait animal model that included ultrasound IMF values on all pigs scanned to estimate breeding values for ultrasound IMF (U2); and Model 3, a multiple-trait animal model including carcass IMF from slaughtered pigs and the first three principal components from a total of 10 image parameters averaged across four longitudinal ultrasound images to estimate breeding values for carcass IMF (C3). Rank correlations between breeding value estimates for U1 and C1, U1 and U2, and C1 and C3 were 0.95, 0.97, and 0.92, respectively. Other rank correlations were 0.86 or less. In the selection experiment, approximately the top 10% of boars and 50% of gilts were selected. Selection differentials for pigs in Generation 3 were greatest when ranking pigs based on C1, followed by U1, U2, and C3. In addition, selection differential and estimated response were evaluated when simulating selection of the top 1, 5, and 10% of sires and 50% of dams. Results of this analysis indicated the greatest selection differential was for selection based on C1. The greatest loss in selection differential was found for selection based on C3 when selecting the top 10 and 1% of boars and 50% of gilts. The loss in estimated response when selecting varying percentages of boars and the top 50% of gilts was greatest when selection was based on C3 (16.0 to 25.8%) and least for selection based on U1 (1.3 to 10.9%). Estimated genetic change from selection based on carcass IMF was greater than selection based on ultrasound IMF. Results show that selection based on a combination of ultrasonically predicted IMF and sib carcass IMF produced the greatest selection differentials and should lead to the greatest genetic change.