Effects of (15)N application frequency on nitrogen uptake efficiency in Citrus trees

Two irrigation systems were used to compare nitrogen uptake efficiency in citrus trees and to evaluate the NO3(-) runoff in Navelina orange trees [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck] on Carrizo citrange rootstock (Citrus sinensis x Poncirus trifoliata Raf.). These were fertilized with 125 g N as labelled K...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of plant physiology Vol. 160; no. 12; pp. 1429 - 1434
Main Authors Quinones, A, Banuls, J, Millo, E.P, Legaz, F
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 2003
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0176-1617
DOI10.1078/0176-1617-01018

Cover

More Information
Summary:Two irrigation systems were used to compare nitrogen uptake efficiency in citrus trees and to evaluate the NO3(-) runoff in Navelina orange trees [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck] on Carrizo citrange rootstock (Citrus sinensis x Poncirus trifoliata Raf.). These were fertilized with 125 g N as labelled K15NO3 and grown outdoors in containers filled with a sand-loamy soil. Two groups of 3 trees received this N dose either in five equally split applications by a flooding irrigation system or in 66 applications by drip. Trees were harvested at the end of the vegetative cycle (December) and the isotopic ratios of 15N/14N were measured in the soil-plant system. The N uptake efficiency of the whole tree was higher with drip irrigation (75 %) than with flooding system (64 %). In the 0-90 cm soil profile, the N immobilized in the organic fraction was similar for both irrigation methods (around 13 %), whereas the N retained as NO3(-) was 1% of the N applied under drip and 10% under flooding. In the last case, most of NO3(-) remained under root system and it could be lost to leaching either by heavy rainfalls or excessive water applications. These results showed that a drip irrigation system was more efficient for improving water use and N uptake from fertilizer, in addition to potentially reduced leaching losses.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0176-1617
DOI:10.1078/0176-1617-01018